Відео

At the beginning of Genesis God creates EVERYTHING. So why did he plop the tree of knowledge down in the Garden to begin with? Dan, are there books that speculate where all these different myths that were cobbled together into Genesis originated?

I'm going to become Muslim now because this is exactly what Islam is saying about Jesus and God. In Islam, God doesn't have kids and parents and wives and has no human characteristics and that Jesus is only a major prophet and messenger not God and not the Son of God. Looks like Islam is the corrective original Christianity of Jesus himself.

Sad that the man got whippings as a little boy just for asking questions. Indoctrination at best.

I'm going to become Muslim now because this is exactly what Islam is saying about Jesus and God. In Islam, God doesn't have kids and parents and wives and has no human characteristics and that Jesus is only a major prophet and messenger not God and not the Son of God. Looks like Islam is the corrective original Christianity of Jesus himself.

Genesis is a stupid, weird, batshit crazy fairytale. It isn't history. It isn't science. It isn't possible. And mostly it is toxic.

The Adam and Eve story is so many levels of stupid I don't know how anybody falls for it and doesn't just put the book down or go running for the door.

I read Isaiah 53 automatically I knew it is talking about Christ

A very annoying and frustrating man.

So Bible god is a deceiver, a diabolical, egotistical monster. The text doesn’t lie, Bible god does.

Are you using a mouse with your left hand? Or are we seeing mirror image?

He asked good questions, and got great answers.

0:05 Did promises to show us the most common mistake regarding the Bible, and then proceeds to argue KJV only... at least he kept his promise.

I wanna know how the ring of power connects with the other rings. Is it like bluetooth, or a huge wifi, 5G? Galadriel is my favorite. LOTR is way better then the bible.

Or it’s just literature and we’sa trying to make it real.

This is partly why I became a non-theistic Luciferian. Knowledge and truth matter and the core narrative of the Bible, as it is commonly understood, is violently against that. It is about power and submission. Its model for humanity is infantilizing and its methods brutal. All it offers in return is a lifetime of shame and a revenge fantasy. I spent 40 years taking that book seriously. I studied it academically from a specifically Fundamentalist perspective. I had enough, simply put, and I decided to “put away childish things” and then take a stand for myself and others based on acceptance and compassion. If that makes me wrong in whatever god(s) that may or may not exist eyes, so be it. Here I stand. I can do no other.

Number 1) Sure, but not undeniable, #2 Denied - no evidence there was a tomb, #3 Denied - only a few (3 maybe 4) not 'various' and if that is a 'group' well ok whatever, and 'believing' something happened is not the same as it actually happened, #4 Sure, but not undeniable, #5 Denied, there is very little to suggest that they were willing to die for this belief, #6 Sure, Paul and James believed. All of this is basically - the Bible tells me so - a hodgepodge of discrepancies and late anonymous so-called 'witnesses.' No thanks - more likely natural explanations for these people's belief that some dude rose!

What i want to know is something from the people who say it was that he would eventually die. If he was already immortal, why couldn't he eat of the Tree of Life?

Many Christians will argue god meant a day as in God's time which a day to god is 1,000 years. Please make a video about this.

There's such a great deal to unravel. Suffice it to say that Adam named the woman (Genesis 2:22) "Woman" (Genesis 2:23), which infers an obligation to train up the woman in all that he knows and understands about Eden. So, the Serpent does not deceive Woman. Neither does the LORD God deceive Adam. The death that concerned Adam was temporal. The death that imbues the law of Eden's judgment is ethereal. The moment Adam, not Woman, eats what's forbidden is the moment Adam dies. Adam's death is figurative as it infers that, having obtained what he'd always sought, Adam sets his face against the LORD God--i.e., death.

Ok, elevator pitch: you and Joel do “Bible Soup” on UA-cam once a week with the best/worst vids you’ve seen that week. I’d sub. Just saying.

This is exactly what the serpent did, being a wise ass with semantics. This is like a father saying to his child, "The moment you take drugs, you will be kicked out of this house" And his wise ass child will say: "I took drugs *yesterday* in my room yet I'm still here, you're a liar because you said in that *moment* I'll be kicked out."

This is why I bristle at the question, "If the God of the Bible were real, would you worship Him?" The question is asked as though there were a clear meaning to the question, but I don't know what they are even asking.

Not that anyone cares but the Book of Jubilees gives the answer. Says that Adam lived to be 930, which would be 70 years short of 1000 years (1 day for the Lord). So in God’s time being the same as Adam’s time when he was in the garden, dying that same day would have meant before 1000 years.

Adonai is a big fat fibber confirmed.

Well actually this shows then that if 1. Kidnappers that put people in slavery is to be killed and 2. You are allowed to buy slaves then it mean: only those that volunteer to be slaves are allowed to be bought.

So why the curse on the serpent?

What do you mean by, "That's not how Aramaic works?" I understand what the sentence means -- i've listened to linguists before -- but how does that apply here, where the fellow is claiming that lines were dropped? Surely that can happen in any language.

The only deceivers are the ones that call God a liar. The wages of sin is death. In the day they are of the fruit, sin and death entered the world. It’s not that complicated, but atheists larping as Bible scholars pretend it is.

Scholars of the history of Rome & Israel absolutely DO NOT agree that Ecclesiastical interpolations are authentic. Josephus, Tacitus, & Suetonius (Pliny the Younger’s personal assistant, and close friend), only called one man the messiah…. Vespasian. Flavius Josephus, Jewish War 3.399-404 and 6.310-315; Suetonius, Life of Vespasian 4.5; Tacitus, Annals, 15.47; Tacitus, Histories, 5.13 ✌🏼

Blame is on the Satan but the accountability of action was on Adam and Eve. Islamically, Satan's purpose is to intice you to do wrong. Whether you give into it or not that's in your control.. If you give in, then you'll be held accountable according to that And If you do not, then you'd be rewarded for it. Don't think, you will not be tested in this life because you certainly will be.

You'd think if the sun stopped moving, the curtain of the temple was torn in two and a dead man was seen by crowds of people, there would be some accounts of it besides the gospels. It never happened.

Reading Mark i found the followers were not close to the crucifixion site: the women watched from afar. They went to the tomb the second morning after the burial to find... four completely different versions. The most important event in their lives and the small group of witnesses wasn't able to give a coherent account. Like nothing really happened except for an empty tomb with the suspect that they simply took the wrong one, the only they found open.

Do I have a choice 😂😂😂

😂😂😂 bru really 🤣🤣🤣

The world's most fearsome fighting team 😂😂

About the 3 narrative arcs (Garden of Eden, Noah & Flood, Tower of Babel) I can see how the first and last involve mankind trying to assume divine attributes. Knowledge of Good and Evil is just for God? Sure. The Tower of Babel was going to reach the heavens, so someone has to put a stop to that. But about Noah's Flood... There is a quick mention of the Sons of God marrying human women and the resulting Nephilim and the heroes of old, but then there's a total change in direction and suddenly it's all about how depraved people have become and how God regrets creating them and it's flood time. So the story in Genesis really doesn't support the flood as preventing mankind from achieving any divine attribute. Is Dan thinking about a version of the flood story that predates Genesis?

What do all three stories have in common? They never happened.

Why would humans want to be divine? Being human is difficult enough!

Wow, TWO levels of pure and utter nonsense this time! 😲

DOUBLE STACK PURE & UTTER NONSENSE!

Another video where everyone is wrong and only you are right! The coincidence is 100% for all your videos! I wonder what the probability is?

0:21 wheee-oooo-wheeee-ooooo-whee-oooo Hard to focus on what he's saying with the car alarm. I think that's the point of using distracting synth demos.

I find that on this planet “god” is on the side of money and large armies. Seems like we’re doomed for now. Cheers ❤

God said? No, someone said that god said.

I really enjoy that you not only combat apologia on the internet, but you also answer genuine questions to those even if it means this is a step in their deconversion. Thank you, Dan

At the end of the day we must realise that it is just a story and not literal history. This is like asking if Daffy Duck and Bugs Bunny had a conversation.

Hey Dan could you do a video on why you decided to stop responding to Inspiring Philosophy

Watching that initial clip was baffling. He doesn't even attempt to justify _why_ he favors the the KJV version???

We need a national "Snakes Tell the Truth" day.

Why didn't God just get rid of Adam and Eve. Would have solved two problems. (1) His warning would have come true. and (2) He could start over with a clean slate. This time put a guard on BOTH trees. No need for that flood or all that animal sacrificing either.